A complex and ever-changing investment landscape provides challenge and purpose for our team.

May You Live in Interesting Times

April, 2023 | Tara Elliott

”May you live in interesting times.” 1

By now, we are sure most of you have read about the latest development in large language models (LLMs), which are artificial intelligence systems designed to process and generate natural language text. While several versions are under development, OpenAI has received a great deal of attention of late with the release of ChatGPT-4. We thought it would be timely to try out GPT-4 and incorporate a few queries and responses into this letter. While GPT-4’s knowledge base is limited to data through September 2021, the system is impressive, providing almost immediate responses to questions. Nevertheless, we lightly edited some of the responses we deemed overly wordy or repetitive.

On to the markets, which continue to be dominated by the interdependent forces of inflation, interest rates, and economic growth (or contraction as in a recession). Inflation has continued to fall from its 9% peak in June 2022 with the most recent monthly reading at 5%. That is still too high relative to the Fed’s long-term target of 2%. The market is expecting just one more rate hike of .25% in May before the Fed pauses and begins cutting rates later in the year. Given the lag between monetary policy and its desired effect, most observers also predict an economic slowdown or mild recession, short-term pain which Chairman Powell is willing to accept to avoid the longer-term corrosive effects of inflation.

In 2022, those higher interest rates reduced the value of both bonds and stocks, hitting growth stocks particularly hard. In the first quarter, the pain shifted to the banking sector. Much has been written about the Silicon Valley Bank failure, so we won’t rehash the saga here except to point out that many other regional banks face similar challenges (as evidenced by the news of First Republic being taken over by the FDIC and sold to J.P. Morgan): vulnerable deposits and unrecognized losses on both investments and loans. In the first quarter of 2023 alone, $600 billion in deposits exited U.S. commercial banks in search of greater safety and/or higher interest rates.

Q: What is the impact of a large reduction in commercial bank deposits?

GPT-4: A large reduction in bank deposits can have significant impacts on the bank and the broader economy. Here are some potential consequences:

  • Reduction in available funds:A large reduction in deposits … can limit the bank's ability to make new loans or extend credit to customers, which can have a ripple effect on the broader economy.em>
  • Liquidity issues: … A bank needs to maintain enough cash or liquid assets to meet the demands of its depositors. If depositors withdraw a large amount of money, the bank may struggle to meet its obligations and may need to borrow money or sell assets to make up for the shortfall.
  • Reduced profitability: Banks earn money by lending out deposits and earning interest on those loans. If there is a large reduction in deposits, the bank's ability to earn interest income will be reduced, which can negatively impact its profitability.
  • Credit crunch: A large reduction in bank deposits can cause a credit crunch, where businesses and individuals find it difficult to access credit. This can lead to a slowdown in economic activity, as businesses may be unable to invest in new projects or hire new workers.
  • Potential for bank failure: If a bank experiences a very large reduction in deposits and faces liquidity issues, it may be at risk of failing. In extreme cases, this can lead to bank runs, where depositors all try to withdraw their money at the same time, exacerbating the bank's liquidity issues and potentially leading to a systemic crisis.

The most acute consequences, liquidity issues and bank failures, were largely limited by the Fed’s rescue actions although many (including notable investors Paul Singer and Ken Griffin) fear the “cure” may prove temporary and only heighten long-term risks in the form of moral hazard.

GPT-4: Moral hazard is a term used in economics and finance to describe a situation where one party takes risks because they know they will not bear the full cost of those risks. … in the context of banking and finance, moral hazard might occur when banks or financial institutions take on excessive risk because they know that if things go wrong, they may be bailed out by the government or the central bank. This can lead to a destabilization of the financial system and ultimately harm the broader economy.

We have already seen many of the other consequences GPT-4 listed emerge. First quarter 2023 earnings announcements by regional banks generally reflected deposit outflows, lower net interest margins, and tightening lending standards, although conditions are still far from a “credit crunch”. The full economic impact of tighter lending is yet to be seen although it could be significant as regional banks are estimated to account for 50% of all commercial and industrial lending and 40-70% (depending on the source) of commercial real estate loans. These developments make the Fed’s tightrope act far more precarious.

Speaking of commercial real estate (CRE), this is developing into a looming threat to both real estate equity investors and lenders as longer-term trends accelerated by COVID impact the value and use cases of many properties. This is how GPT-4 describes the potential impacts of COVID on CRE (again based on data through September 2021):

  • Remote work: The pandemic has accelerated the adoption of remote work, and many companies have realized that it is possible to work effectively from home. This trend could lead to a reduction in demand for office space, particularly in urban areas, as companies look to downsize their real estate footprint and save on costs.
  • Changes in demand: The pandemic has also changed consumer behavior, with a shift towards e-commerce and a reduction in brick-and-mortar retail. This could lead to a decline in demand for retail space, particularly for traditional shopping malls.
  • Safety and hygiene: The pandemic has highlighted the importance of safety and hygiene, and tenants are likely to prioritize buildings that prioritize these factors in the future. Landlords may need to invest in building upgrades, such as touchless entry systems, improved air filtration systems, and enhanced cleaning protocols.
  • Flexibility: The pandemic has also underscored the importance of flexibility in commercial real estate, as tenants seek to adapt to changing market conditions. Landlords may need to offer more flexible lease terms and build out spaces that can be easily reconfigured for different uses.

Sounds pretty on point, doesn’t it? Office is currently showing the most weakness with high profile owners (Brookfield, Blackstone, and Columbia Property Trust to name a few) defaulting on large mortgages. A more widespread real estate correction could be triggered by the expiration of tenant leases and/or loans (an estimated 10% of CRE loans will mature in the coming year), potentially adding further stress to bank balance sheets and securitized markets.

Another potential jolt is the debt ceiling which the Treasury has avoided breaching through “extraordinary measures” since January 2023. Unless Congress can agree to raise the limit, the Treasury will run out of flexibility in the next few months, possibly as soon as June, given that tax receipts came in lower than expected. Regardless of your position on the issue, the time for compromise is becoming very short even while many warn of dire consequences. GPT-4 identifies potential consequences as a default on debt obligations, government shutdown, economic downturn, international repercussions (given that the U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency), and loss of investor confidence. As all of these imply a higher cost of capital, the impact on markets would likely be very negative at least in the short-term.

The rates market (Treasurys) reflects these myriad concerns as the yield on the 10 year Treasury note declined from 3.96% at the end of February to 3.57% as of this writing. On the short end of the curve, interest rates typically reflect the fed funds rate, although there is unusual divergence between one-month and three-month Treasury bills as investors opt for the shorter-term securities to avoid getting caught up in the debt ceiling drama. According to the Wall Street Journal, “Surging demand has driven one-month T bill prices higher, sending the yield down to 3.313% from 4.675% at the end of March. Bills maturing in three months yield 5.105%—a record incentive for lending to the government for a couple months more.” The 3-month/10-year Treasury yield curve inversion (shorter-term interest rates higher than longer-term rates) hit its steepest magnitude since 1981. Historically, this has been a reliable recession indicator.

On the other hand, equity markets, credit spreads, and the VIX (volatility index) all appear to be sending more sanguine signals. What accounts for the disconnect? In the case of the equity markets, stock leadership is the narrowest since the 1990s according to J.P. Morgan. Although the S&P 500 Index gained 7.5% for the quarter, looking below the surface reveals that the entirety of the return can be explained by 28 stocks and just six stocks accounted for 53% of the return. In keeping with our AI theme, these six stocks are all LLM innovation companies which gained 45% as a group in the wake of ChatGPT’s popularity. We note that these stocks were probably due for a bounce after being down significantly last year, likely benefited from a lower discount rate, and may be viewed in the context of flight to quality due to relatively high certainty of cash flows.

In high yield land, the index gained 3.7% for the quarter, a result which can be attributed to optimism for a soft landing (i.e., the Fed is able to traverse the high wire without falling). Despite concerns about an economic slowdown, defaults remain muted as many borrowers took advantage of the long period of accommodative credit markets to term out debt in structures marked by low rates, long maturities, and lax covenants. As a result, the “wall of maturities” seems manageable until the 2025-2028 timeframe, delaying the potential reckoning in the credit markets.

Lest the litany of challenges facing the economy and markets is discouraging, we should point out that cycles are inevitable and ultimately healthy for the system, though not for every individual security. Cycles provide a mechanism to wring out market excesses and create opportunities for investors.

While still early, we see this pattern emerging across a number of areas. Even though a traditional distressed credit cycle does not appear imminent, our multi-strategy managers report greater price dispersion among securities, mispricing within capital structures, more attractive terms from those companies needing capital, and pockets of distress in non-traditional areas. Less accommodative conditions in general should provide a catalyst for fundamental differentiation among companies and benefit long/short strategies, an environment for which we have waited patiently as our managers have slogged through three years of a largely macro-driven market.

Within global equities, we note that large cap U.S. equities trade at valuations above 25-year averages. Despite the recent dominance of U.S. equities, high quality companies are domiciled all around the globe and are currently cheaper overseas. In fact, stock prices have been less problematic than currencies. As the Fed reaches the end of its hiking cycle and interest rate differentials narrow, we expect that headwind to abate. The two most recent quarters have manifested a reversal of dollar strength although we believe there is a lot of room to run. We continue to find what we believe are attractive opportunities in the private markets and encourage you to read the letters on Private Equity and Real Assets included in this quarter’s book for a fuller discussion.

One of the tired axioms of our profession is “You can’t eat relative performance.” We believe the phrase misses the point if you have at least an intermediate time horizon, as preserving capital in down markets leaves an investor with more capital to compound in recovering markets. Imagine the benchmark that you are measured against moving along through time … over the years, there are both good markets and bad. We pursue a defensive approach that tends to do better than the balanced benchmark when markets are soft and to do a little worse when markets are very strong. The past three years, which we refer to as the “COVID Period,” have been “interesting times” indeed. This period captures the COVID-induced panic in equity markets, the rapid recovery as governments intervened, the resultant surge in inflation, aggressive rate hiking which hammered stocks and bonds in 2022, and, most recently, a narrow market recovery. Such rapid adjustments have at times created treacherous conditions as hidden risks were uncovered and trading anomalies appeared. Protecting capital during those two major downdrafts was an significant determinant of investment performance in the “COVID Period”. This is what we seek to accomplish in the ebb and flow of markets. Our primary tools are diversification, hedging, active management, and patience.

Returning to LLM and Artificial Intelligence (AI), the topic has become divisive with some thrilled with the potential benefits to society while others fear the potential risks. A group of experts in the field and industry leaders wrote an open letter calling for a six-month pause in developing systems more powerful than ChatGPT-4. As is typical in the case of rapidly developing technologies, the regulatory regimes are behind the curve. It seems that AI is here to stay in a very big way, and we are unlikely to “put the genie back in the bottle.” For now, we’ll let ChatGPT-4 have the last word on whether humans should be concerned about AI.

  • As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, but I can provide information on this topic based on my training data.
  • AI has the potential to bring many benefits to society, such as improving healthcare, increasing efficiency in various industries, and helping to solve complex problems. However, as with any powerful technology, there are also concerns about its impact on society and the potential risks it poses.
  • One of the primary concerns about AI is its potential impact on jobs, as automation could potentially displace workers in many industries. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential misuse of AI, such as the development of autonomous weapons or the use of AI for surveillance or control.
  • Another concern is the potential for AI systems to make decisions that have unintended consequences or reinforce existing biases in society. For example, an AI system designed to screen job applicants could inadvertently discriminate against certain groups based on factors such as race or gender.
  • In general, the impact of AI on society will depend on how it is developed, deployed, and regulated. While there are certainly concerns about its potential risks, there are also many ways in which AI can be used to benefit society. Therefore, it is important for researchers, policymakers, and the public to work together to ensure that AI is developed and used in a responsible and ethical manner [emphasis added].

One can only hope.

April 2023

Tara Elliott

1 From GPT-4: “May you live in interesting times” is a well-known but apocryphal English expression that is often considered to be a curse, although it is also sometimes seen as a blessing. The phrase is believed to have originated in China, but there is no clear evidence of this. In any case, the phrase is often used to suggest that living in "interesting" or turbulent times can be both exciting and challenging, but also difficult and dangerous. It is important to note, however, that the phrase is not an actual Chinese proverb or curse, and it is not necessarily an accurate reflection of the Chinese view of history or the world.


Information contained in this presentation is based on the views and opinions as they exist as of the date this presentation was made available. Information in this presentation does not constitute advice or a recommendation or offer to sell or a solicitation to deal in any security or financial product. It is provided for information purposes only and on the understanding that the recipient has sufficient knowledge and experience to be able to understand and make its own evaluation of the proposals and services described herein, any risks associated therewith and any related legal, tax, accounting or other material considerations. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to their specific portfolio or situation, they are encouraged to consult with the professional adviser of their choosing, and recipients should not rely on this material in making any future investment decision.
We do not represent that the information contained herein is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Certain information contained herein (including any forward-looking statements and economic and market information) has been obtained from published sources and/or prepared by third parties and in certain cases has not been updated through the date hereof. While such sources are believed to be reliable, we do not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. We do not undertake any obligation to update the information contained herein as of any future date.
The statements in this presentation, including statements in the present tense, may contain projections or forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, intentions or expectations. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investments are subject to risk, including the possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that projected returns or risk assumptions will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this document, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio.

Related Readings